NW-Mailing-List Digest, Vol 224, Issue 8

NW Mailing List nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Tue Apr 11 15:45:06 EDT 2023


 Gary,
In the 1920s.  Wig-Wags were installed up until about 1950; flashing-light signals thereafter.

Tim Hensley

    On Tuesday, April 11, 2023 at 01:31:25 AM EDT, <nw-mailing-list-request at nwhs.org> wrote:  
 
 Send NW-Mailing-List mailing list submissions to
    nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/nw-mailing-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    nw-mailing-list-request at nwhs.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
    nw-mailing-list-owner at nwhs.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of NW-Mailing-List digest..."


When replying, please edit the Subject line so it reflects the topic you are responding to.

Also delete the non-pertinent parts of the digest when replying to a referenced post.

Your fellow list subscribers will appreciate it.



Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Track rail weight (NW Mailing List)
  2. RE: Air Start C630 (NW Mailing List)
  3. Crossing Shanties. (NW Mailing List)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:54:26 +0000 (UTC)
From: NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
To: NW Mailing List via NW-Mailing-List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
Subject: Re: Track rail weight
Message-ID: <mailman.349.1681123549.2004909.nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

 Dave
You are correct about code 70.? Code 55 is 70lb and Code 40 is around 40lb.
Larry Smith

    On Sunday, April 9, 2023 at 03:18:41 PM CDT, NW Mailing List via NW-Mailing-List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> wrote:  
 
  N&W in the 1950's seemed to favor 132 lb eastbound and 131? lb westbound between Roanoke and Norfolk.? Code 83 would do for both.? It also used some 130 PS rail on westbound tracks.? This is a PRR size designation and Code 83 would probably? work, even though 130 PS is a relative of 112 RE and 115lb RE sections.? It has a similar height but a heavier head section.? Code 100 represents 152 lb and 155 lb PRR rail.? There may have been other RR's that used these very tall sections, but PRR designed and used both extensively.? They are very easy to spot in photos because of the web height.? N&W may have had some but I haven't found any on the track charts I have here.? Although? Code 100 is in widespread use, it's too tall for accurate application other than PRR. On the lower end, I believe Code 70 represents 90 to 100 lb rail, but I'm not sure of that one.

Dave Stephenson


    On Sunday, April 9, 2023 at 03:19:07 PM EDT, NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> wrote:  
 
 I'm getting ready to start building some dioramas and I need to order model track. Is there a specific rail weight that N&W use for the mainline in the 50's?I get the impression that Code 83 is more appropriate for today, and Code 100 is better for steam era? Is this accurate?
Ho Scale Code 83 is equivalent to 132 lb railHo Scale Code 100 is equivalent to 156 lb rail

ThanksMike Rector________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
  ________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20230410/fed44e21/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 16:13:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
To: N&W Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
Subject: RE: Air Start C630
Message-ID: <mailman.369.1681158310.2004909.nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20230410/5275e48c/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 16:40:38 -0400
From: NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
To: NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
Subject: Crossing Shanties.
Message-ID: <mailman.383.1681169066.2004909.nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

When did the Norfolk and Western transition from trackside crossing shanties to electric crossing gates?

Gary P. Price


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/


------------------------------

End of NW-Mailing-List Digest, Vol 224, Issue 8
***********************************************
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20230411/49683c25/attachment.htm>


More information about the NW-Mailing-List mailing list