I sure would like to see a 4-8-0
NW Modeling List
nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org
Thu Jan 24 08:23:40 EST 2008
Minimum mainline is 40 inches. Super elevated too. My 7 Powerhouse Y3¹s
look correct as they snake thru the scenery, but the BLI, Lifelike, and
Rivirossi engines just look ....wrong. I run in 12 by 20 feet.
Mark Lindsey
Stuck in the 1930¹s
> Mark,
>
> What size radius curves do you have? Some people don't have space for huge
> radius curves and this method of articulation that you hate allows them to run
> on the tighter radius curves. The overhang created by your form of
> articulation would take out scenery on many layouts. Why don't we just enjoy
> the locomotives.
>
> John Rhodes
>
> On Jan 22, 2008 8:21 AM, NW Modeling List <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org> wrote:
>> I have given up on the Manufacturers. The BLI Y6b, while it LOOKS good, and
>> RUNS GOOD, it articulates WRONG! The Powerhouse series of Y3's got it right.
>> So, what is BLI's excuse for copying Rivorosi's 55 year old concept? Same
>> for the BLI "A". That was a bad choice they made.
>>
>> Mark Lindsey
>>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org
> To change your subscription go to
> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list
> Browse the NW-Modeling-List archives at
> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/attachments/20080124/1833a294/attachment.html>
More information about the NW-Modeling-List
mailing list