[game_preservation] Game Canon

[Rowan Kaiser]

That sounds excellent, Marty. A little too excellent, in that it also sounds
close to what I'm trying to do with my book, but hey, so it goes.

Rowan

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Martin Goldberg <wgungfu at gmail.com> wrote:


> What you guys are all describing with your individual viewpoints and

> processes in this matter reminded me of a book by some friends of mine

> (Bill Loguidice and Matt Barton) from last year.  Vintage Games -

>

>

> http://www.amazon.com/Vintage-Games-Insider-History-Influential/dp/0240811461/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1280858796&sr=8-1

>

> Rather than lists of canon games in a genre they took the approach of

> each chapter being about what they considered the most influential

> game of that genre, interweaving the games that preceeded it and that

> were later influenced by it in an intersting narrative.  The basic

> formula for each chapter/game is:

>

> - briefly introduce the game and proceed to give a summary of why it

> was successful and the many clones it produced.

>

> - present the games that came before and paved the way for the main

> focus of each chapter, the influential game itself.

>

> - Discuss any major industry influence and cultural ties and how the

> game was a product of or influenced them.

>

> - identify what the important aspects of the game were itself – what

> innovations it introduced, or important game play and graphical

> elements it included.

>

> - List/discuss some later very popular games that were influenced by

> it and focus on how those games also produced innovations in their own

> right in their attempts to expand on the basic formula

>

> - Discuss the genre itself in closing.

>

> You can read a review I did last year for a little more insight in to the

> book:

>

> http://classicgaming.gamespy.com/View.php?view=Articles.Detail&id=403

>

> To me I like that approach because it gives more context to the game/s

> in a genre you're presenting rather than subjective lists that canons

> can turn in to.  It's also a way to get past the issue of "in order to

> focus on some games, you must ignore others" that Devin points out.

>

>

> Marty

> _______________________________________________

> game_preservation mailing list

> game_preservation at igda.org

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_preservation

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/game_preservation/attachments/20100803/570d8671/attachment.html>