[LEAPSECS] nails in the coffin of mean solar time
    M. Warner Losh 
    imp at bsdimp.com
       
    Thu Jun 14 17:37:55 EDT 2007
    
    
  
In message: <4671B3BD.5010903 at cox.net>
            Greg Hennessy <greg.hennessy at cox.net> writes:
: 
: >> A notable difference between these versions and previous ones is 
: >> that the CGPM's UTC shall be interpreted by the Secretary of the Navy 
: >> as well as NIST.
: > 
: > So the final determination of the policy issue (yea or nay on leap 
: > seconds) shall be whether the US military industrial complex believes 
: > there are more risks in continuing leap seconds (tested over 35 years) 
: > or in a boundless DUT1 (never tested, heretofore negligible for many 
: > applications). 
: 
: No, I expect that means that Ken Johnston of the US Naval Observatory 
: will make the call. Or more precisely Dennis McCarthy.
I gather the efforts are a mere technical correction.  I wonder if
there will be a good time to ask at the Time and Frequency Metrology
Seminar at NIST this week :-)
Warner
    
    
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list