[LEAPSECS] We can all be winners

Rob Seaman seaman at noao.edu
Sun Dec 28 23:10:38 EST 2008


Impossible to keep up with all the messages. Presumably it will calm
down when the leap second turns out to be a non-issue yet again ;-)

M. Warner Losh wrote:


> I contend we don't actually need a mean solar time to the sub-second

> time scale for civil time. A mean solar time to the hour is likely

> sufficient for that.


The key issue is the stability of the civil timescale, not its
precision. However, degrading the precision by 5 orders of magnitude
in one gulp seems rather...excessive. The actual proposal on the
table, of course, simply denies the existence of the Sun in the sky.

Rob



More information about the LEAPSECS mailing list