[LEAPSECS] Schedule for success

[Greg Hennessy]

> I guess the argument here boils down to this.  Greg is saying that

> there exists a definition of GMT such that NASA is right.  In such a

> case, you can point to the definition and be done with it.


While perhaps not a definition, the grounds of what used
to be RGO are now apparently the UK National Maritime
Museum, and they assert that GMT is the same as UTC.

http://www.nmm.ac.uk/explore/astronomy-and-time/time-facts/the-new-millennium