[LEAPSECS] Automation
    M. Warner Losh 
    imp at bsdimp.com
       
    Thu Jan  1 17:11:13 EST 2009
    
    
  
In message: <1230843729.9555.2.camel at glastonbury>
            Ashley Yakeley <ashley at semantic.org> writes:
: On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 09:41 -0700, Rob Seaman wrote:
: > They can't be naively automated.  The schedule is currently  
: > predictable 6 months in advance.  Nobody has objected to a longer  
: > schedule; we're positively giddy to give it a try.  NTP is proof of  
: > concept that automation is possible once the schedule is released.
: 
: This might encourage software engineers to do the wrong thing, that is,
: hard-code a leap-second table.
But leap seconds are already hard coded, or at least there's a table
of them, on many systems that need to grok leap seconds.  similar to
the timezone 'hard coding'.
Warner
    
    
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list