[LEAPSECS] The Debate over UTC and Leap Seconds
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Tue Aug 10 17:35:42 EDT 2010
In message <20100810205658.GA5198 at cox.net>, Greg Hennessy writes:
>> I just did answer the question seriously.
>I can't tell if your solution meets my needs when you answer my
>question with "it depends".
I get the distinct impression that it is not "can't" but "won't" ?
Unless you can put a firm window on the unmodelled excursions in
DUT, you can only set a very conservative bound on DUT over any
given prediction horizon.
If my proposal is adopted, you will have to live with that, or
improve the geophysical models verity.
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the LEAPSECS