[LEAPSECS] POSIX and C (Was: Re: ISO Influence)
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Sat Dec 25 18:04:55 EST 2010
In message <4D1676FE.32284.16EABE95 at dan.tobias.name>, "Daniel R. Tobias" writes
>So what that means is, even if you get the redefinition of UTC you're
>loudly pushing for, the legislatures of the world are free to totally
>ignore it and start using something else, sundials maybe, instead.
But given that very few, if any of these have actually legislated
about leap-seconds, yet they still apply them to their local
timescale from the underlying UTC timescale, I think we can safely
assume that they will continue to follow UTC in this respect.
The entire point of the Meter Convention and of eliminating the
leap-second hack from UTC, is that we don't need to deal with each
government one by one.
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the LEAPSECS