[LEAPSECS] An example

Nero Imhard nimh at pipe.nl
Tue Nov 2 19:32:31 EDT 2010

Op 02-11-10 23:56, Poul-Henning Kamp schreef:

> There very much is: With each passing day, the probability that the next

> leap second will kill somebody because of sloppy engineering increases

> by a possibly non-trivial amount.

Then why aren't you demanding proper engineering instead? Giving in to
sloppy engineering won't be any improvement, now would it? In the long run
it will be even more dangerous.


More information about the LEAPSECS mailing list