[LEAPSECS] Instant (86400 second Java class) [was Java:ThreeTen/JSR-310]
scolebourne at joda.org
Sun Jan 30 05:44:35 EST 2011
On 29 January 2011 23:36, Tom Van Baak <tvb at leapsecond.com> wrote:
>> smoothing for that. (As I've said before, stopping leap seconds now
>> isn't helpful as it adds yet another mapping/complication, rather than
>> removing one)
> This I don't understand. As far as UTC is concerned, isn't the
> proposal to stop leap seconds effectively the same as IERS
> just not sending out email anymore about when the next leap
> second will occur? No java or OS code needs to change.
Correct. But I work on the basis that something else will be added
instead to keep the solar day in tune (for example, non-SI seconds in
general usage, or leap-minutes). The idea that midday or midnight
would cease to have the same meaning to an average person is horrid
and I would suggest something that some politicians would get very
worked up about.
In other words, I flat out don't believe that the tinkering with time
would stop simply because leap-seconds were stopped.
More information about the LEAPSECS