[LEAPSECS] GMT v. UTC

Rob Seaman seaman at noao.edu
Wed Jan 4 13:01:21 EST 2012


And yet googling "greenwich mean time" returns 5,250,000 results (353,000,000 for "gmt" but an unknown number are false positives) including many sites like:

http://www.worldtimeserver.com/current_time_in_UTC.aspx

that equate UTC with GMT. As well as things like:

http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/

that perpetuate the brand as being actually tied to Greenwich and Britain in general.

Which is it? Does GMT == UTC? Or does it continue to mean what it says, mean solar time at Greenwich? It can't be both in a post-leap second world. That it was deprecated for various technical purposes (not, apparently, all) does not mean it doesn't remain widely used.

Rob
--
On Jan 4, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Tony Finch wrote:


> Rob Seaman <seaman at noao.edu> wrote:

>>

>> It seems quite possible that the plan is similarly "to get rid of" GMT.

>> Indeed, how can GMT continue to have a coherent meaning afterwards?

>

> GMT was discontinued decades ago and has not had a coherent meaning for

> even longer.

>

> Tony.




More information about the LEAPSECS mailing list