[LEAPSECS] Straw men
    Poul-Henning Kamp 
    phk at phk.freebsd.dk
       
    Mon Jan  9 17:08:23 EST 2012
    
    
  
In message <7422CD7E-2405-4C94-99D6-B9DA1F1BC644 at pipe.nl>, Nero Imhard writes:
>On 2012-01-09, at 20:42, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> It can easily be argued that if you need UT to better than 1s, you
>> should use one of IERS's UT products and you will have five years to
>> make the fix.
>
>This is the arrogance I mentioned earlier. What good is a definition
>(that of UTC being a good approximation of UT) if you can't rely
>on it?
Uhm, we seem to have lost context:  If the definition is changed, you
get 5 years to switch to a timescale with a usable definition before
the change takes effect.
-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
    
    
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list