[LEAPSECS] Leap seconds decision deferred until 2015
mike cook
michael.cook at sfr.fr
Fri Jan 20 02:49:37 EST 2012
Le 20/01/2012 07:19, Steve Allen a écrit :
>
> What is the goal? I don't think the ITU-R saw it today.
> Is the goal to make life easier for operational systems?
> Is the goal to make life easier for bureaucrats?
> Is the goal to preserve conceptual definitions?
> Not all of those are attainable.
Sorry for the previous garble. All thumbs this morning.
As we have been spared the hash up of question ITU-R 236/7, I think the
best approach is to "start again".
In response to Steve's Questions above, I think that in the long term,
all those can be attained, but the base must be a list of requirements
for time dissemination. The questions do not define requirements in any
scientific sense, so let's start with that.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list