[LEAPSECS] And now to something entirely different.

Ian Batten igb at batten.eu.org
Fri Jan 20 18:52:59 EST 2012

On 20 Jan 2012, at 15:36, Rob Seaman wrote:

> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:


>> The only game changer I can spot, is if Daniel Gambis starts to announce leapseconds 30 months in advance with stated intention to get it up to five years, as soon as the science supports DUT1<1s.


> 'Daniel Gambis said that the IERS could confidently predict leap seconds in advance of “two or three years.”'

So why has there only been six months' notice of the June leapsecond in 2012?


More information about the LEAPSECS mailing list