[LEAPSECS] Leap seconds decision deferred until 2015
Richard B. Langley
lang at unb.ca
Tue Jan 24 15:50:04 EST 2012
Some of the news reports were in error. Canada did not switch sides.
Here is a quote from one of Canada's delegates:
"We can confirm [that] Canada's position at the just concluded RA was
opposition to the elimination of the leap second. It is a position we
have consistently held at previous ITU surveys. In fact, at the RA,
Canada contributed significantly to rallying support for either
maintaining the status quo or as a minimum postponing the decision. In
the end, support and opposition to the proposed change were about even."
I have learned that an agenda item for WRC-15 is being drafted to look
at the issue again after further studies at the ITU that will explore
a variety of options to providing a universal continuous time standard.
-- Richard Langley
On 19-Jan-12, at 5:07 PM, Richard B. Langley wrote:
> It seems Canada switched sides! No mention of China's stand in the
> article.
>
> -- Richard
>
> On 19-Jan-12, at 2:51 PM, Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, January 19, 2012 9:03 am, Tony Finch wrote:
>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16625614
>>
>> I knew it... it's enough of a "hot button" issue among the handful of
>> people who care about it that nobody wants to commit to actually
>> taking
>> any action, so it will just keep bouncing around between study
>> committees
>> indefinitely. Maybe 100 years from now they'll still be debating it.
>>
>> That's what happens when you've got something that polarizes the
>> interested parties sharply, with one subset strongly favoring change,
>> another subset strongly favoring the status quo, and the vast masses
>> outside these groups not particularly caring one way or the other,
>> so that
>> there will never be enough massive outside pressure to force the
>> governing
>> bodies to take action instead of calling for yet another committee.
>>
>> It's not like this is an issue that will lead to people marching on
>> the
>> capitol, rallying under the Washington Monument to hear a charismatic
>> speaker saying he has a dream of no more leap seconds (or of leap
>> seconds
>> forever), or holding tea parties or occupation encampments to press
>> for
>> one side or the other on this issue. These sorts of mass movements
>> can
>> sometimes force action when the politicians would rather just keep
>> batting
>> the hot potatoes around, but they're not going to develop here.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dan
>> Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
>> Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
>> Dan's Domain Name Site: http://domains.dan.info/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LEAPSECS mailing list
>> LEAPSECS at leapsecond.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Richard B. Langley E-mail:
> lang at unb.ca |
> | Geodetic Research Laboratory Web: http://www.unb.ca/GGE/
> |
> | Dept. of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Phone: +1 506
> 453-5142 |
> | University of New Brunswick Fax: +1 506
> 453-4943 |
> | Fredericton, N.B., Canada E3B
> 5A3 |
> | Fredericton? Where's that? See: http://
> www.fredericton.ca/ |
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Richard B. Langley E-mail:
lang at unb.ca |
| Geodetic Research Laboratory Web: http://www.unb.ca/GGE/
|
| Dept. of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Phone: +1 506
453-5142 |
| University of New Brunswick Fax: +1 506
453-4943 |
| Fredericton, N.B., Canada E3B
5A3 |
| Fredericton? Where's that? See: http://
www.fredericton.ca/ |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list