[LEAPSECS] Rubber seconds
Ask Bjørn Hansen
ask at develooper.com
Wed Jan 25 17:54:11 EST 2012
On Jan 25, 2012, at 1:05, Michael Sokolov wrote:
> I vigorously advocate only the general idea of rubberization. The
> exact mode of rubberization is up to each individual implementor in
Why do we even try coordinating our clock-ticking if that's okay?
> Alice and Bob may choose two different rubberization schemes, but the
> magnitude of the difference between their clock readings can't exceed
> 1 s at any point.
How should public NTP servers behave during the leap second period if there's no agreed upon "rubberization scheme"?
More information about the LEAPSECS