[LEAPSECS] any other parties?
nimh at pipe.nl
Mon Jul 9 08:10:42 EDT 2012
> isn't very celebratory. A friend of mine has suggested that one should
> celebrate a leap second the NTP/Unix way, by repeating whatever one did
> in the previous second
Is that really the Unix way? I always thought that "proper"
implementations didn't step back, but paused the time for a second at
:59:59 (while still having subsequent calls of gettimeofday return
increasing values by adding microseconds as needed). Do I recall
More information about the LEAPSECS