[LEAPSECS] more poison in the NTP pool
p at 2038bug.com
Tue Sep 4 12:19:17 EDT 2012
> > previously i proposed that any code that measures a fail-timeout make
> > that timeout 1000ms longer whenever t % 86400 is near zero
> I assume that you mean near 0 or near 86400 since % is unsigned.
code example posted previously:
> > this pattern would duck most bugs
> With timeouts, yes. With other things, not so much...
as a thought-experiment, i conjecture that it would have prevented all
the system failures reported in the media in the last few leap seconds
am i close?
> > these bogus advertisements seem like another good reason to implement
> > this
> It says a lot about the robustness of leap seconds...
More information about the LEAPSECS