[LEAPSECS] LEAPSECS Digest, Vol 88, Issue 31

[Greg Hennessy]

On 01/14/2014 06:29 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:


> It follows rather trivially from the fact that there were no

> year zero, that the first century must contain the years [1...100] in

> order to be a century.


I dispute the assertion there was no year zero,
there clearly was a year zero, it happened right
after the year -1.