[LEAPSECS] Letters Blogatory
brooks at edlmax.com
Wed Mar 11 12:53:48 EDT 2015
Overall he seems to make a good philosophical argument why solar time is
good for humans. But his conclusion seems confused.
"... let the airlines and the Internet companies use TAI".
Ah, the airlines already use GPS (TAI-like) for navigation, and "local
civil time" for scheduling, while the "internet companies" grapple with
TAI-like timescales, POSIX, and "local civil time" representations at
machine and human levels. There's atomic time and solar time and thats
the inconvenient truth that TAI v.s. UTC with Leap Seconds reconciles.
That's the whole point.
"In other words, let them simply stop adjusting for for leap seconds.
Let the atomic clocks become progressively more wrong."
Whoa! Hold the phone! What do you mean? Adjust TAI's frequency to match
Earth?!? Nobody anywhere is suggesting that! Of does he mean adjust the
count or labeling of TAI? Nobody's suggesting that either. That's what
"It seems to me we have our priorities backwards when we worry about how
to keep our everyday natural time in sync with our atomic clocks instead
of vice versa!"
Huh? I think he means the solar day ought to be the priority because its
more meaningful for humans, which I generally agree with. But this is an
argument to "keep Leap Seconds", not change TAI. He seems to have missed
the fact he himself makes earlier that there are two timescales.
Articles like that add confusion to the public discussion.
On 2015-03-11 09:44 AM, Steve Allen wrote:
> Ted Folkman is a lawyer who blogs about international law
> Steve Allen <sla at ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS)
> UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855
> 1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015
> Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m
> LEAPSECS mailing list
> LEAPSECS at leapsecond.com
More information about the LEAPSECS