[LEAPSECS] And so it begins ...
sla at ucolick.org
Thu Oct 29 21:18:56 EDT 2015
On Thu 2015-10-29T19:23:36 +0000, Richard Langley hath writ:
> The article is wrong. Canada has not taken a position for (or against) doing away with leap seconds.
CITEL is against the leap second, and Canada is part of CITEL.
So that's different than CEPT where UK and Russia prevented a
regional position from being reached.
Steve Allen <sla at ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855
1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m
More information about the LEAPSECS