Minor regexp oversight for setext headings

[John Gruber]

Allan Odgaard <29mtuz102 at sneakemail.com> wrote on 10/7/06 at 
6:27 AM:


> Noticed the patterns for setext style headings are:

>       ^(.+)[ \t]*\n=+[ \t]*\n+

>   Should be:

>       ^(.+?)[ \t]*\n=+[ \t]*\n+


Why? I can't see where this would make a difference.

-J.G.