Text::Markdown vs MDTest (Was: Re: forking Markdown.pl?)
    Tomas Doran 
    bobtfish at bobtfish.net
       
    Fri Mar 21 17:47:24 EDT 2008
    
    
  
On 21 Mar 2008, at 20:39, Tomas Doran wrote:
>
> On 29 Feb 2008, at 05:17, Michel Fortin wrote:
>
>> Le 2008-02-28 à 18:04, Yuri Takhteyev a écrit :
>>> Perhaps there is a need for a better _perl_ implementation (or a  
>>> few,
>>> competition is fun), but as far as "official" goes, we need a
>>> comprehensive and up-to-date spec and a test suite against which all
>>> implementations could be measured.
>>
>> I'm maintaining MDTest for that. If anyone wants a new test case  
>> to be added to MDTest, I'll gladly accept it. If anyone wants to  
>> dispute one of MDTest's expected result, I'm open to discussion,  
>> preferably on this list so that everybody can take part.
>
> As promised, here are the results of MDTest 1.1's Markdown tests  
> against Text::Markdown's trunk code (what is going to be 1.0.18,  
> should be exactly the same for the to be released 1.0.17):
<snip>
> So, the *only* things that Text::Markdown currently fails on are  
> small whitespace changes..
I'm going mental tonight obviously (or rather, I had too large a  
glass of wine with dinner). These test results are exactly what I'd  
expect as Text::Markdown is know to pass the full Markdown test suite  
already..
Looking at the PHP Markdown test suite (also in MDTest), there are a  
number of bugs that I've still got which Michel has fixed with PHP  
Markdown, I'll report back about these later when I've had a bit more  
chance to look at them.
Cheers
Tom
    
    
More information about the Markdown-Discuss
mailing list