Proposed table specification (long!)

[David Parsons]

On May 10, 2011, at 8:54 PM, Simon Bull wrote:


> Thanks for your additional comments Fletcher.

>

>

> If the proposed syntax overly complicated, I am very happy to  

> simplify it.  The question is whether or not the following is really  

> complicated?



   Implement what you have, and then you'll have an idea if it's too
complicated.   Working code is the best test of the complexity of a
design.


    -david parsons