Definition list as image caption
    Jakob 
    JakoV at gmx.at
       
    Sat Jun 23 10:18:40 EDT 2012
    
    
  
> Not at all. If we want to allow anything inside a figure element (as HTML5
> permits), then all we have to do is force the figure content to be
> indented. You could even nest figures that way.
*That's maybe even better!* So the syntax would be just the inversion of my proposal: Instead of figure => caption you have caption => figure. This makes a lot more sense.
However, would we still be able to have multi-paragraph captions?
> Now, just make the leading "!" and indentation optional for an image and
> you get this:
> 
> 	[[ Figure 1: A simple image ]]
> 	
The only problem with this would be that *every* image would get a figure. However i think `! ` would do the job just fine: so only the indent would be optional.
-- 
NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!                                  
Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a
    
    
More information about the Markdown-Discuss
mailing list