attribute blocks for definition lists

Fletcher T. Penney fletcher at
Thu Jul 18 10:22:37 EDT 2013

Right now, I don't think I would implement this particular syntax.


Fletcher T. Penney
fletcher at

On Jul 11, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Matthieu Codron <codronm+markdown at> wrote:

> From: "Fletcher T. Penney"


> I'm not sure I want to head down that path yet for MultiMarkdown. I'm not ruling it out for all time, but I worry about the "cruft" vs "reward" balance.


> I understand your point of view. But I'd like to avoid future implementation divergences ; so I'd like to hear you about the propoosed syntax : if you were about to implement it in MultiMarkdown, would you adopt this syntax ? I know you cannot give a definitive answer, but at least can you confirm it seems good to you ?


> Thanks


> Matthieu

> _______________________________________________

> Markdown-Discuss mailing list

> Markdown-Discuss at


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4899 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : <>

More information about the Markdown-Discuss mailing list