when rational discussion was still a possibility

[Joel MaHarry]

please take me off of this interminable discussion

Digital and brand communications
..........................................................................................................................................
Joel MaHarry | Creative Director
joel.maharry at ulrichmaharry.com 
O (310) 504-1790 | D (310) 993.1334
1528 6th St., Suite 512
Santa Monica, CA  90401
www.ulrichmaharry.com
.........................................................................................................................................
 

On Sep 5, 2014, at 9:16 PM, John MacFarlane <jgm at berkeley.edu> wrote:

+++ Michel Fortin [Sep 05 14 17:07 ]:
> From an implementer point of view, unless a detailed standard is written as a description of what your own parser does, you'll have to spend a lot of time tweaking things to match that standard. By "a lot of time" I mean more than what it took you to implement the parser in the first place. Remember, it's always getting the last 20% that takes 80% of the time. So you'll spend a lot of time to achieve some dubious tradeoff. Implementers have better things to do with their time.
> 
> So my conclusion is that if you want one or another Markdown flavor to become the standard, you need to find a way for its implementation to be included everywhere. But with all the diverse language ecosystem we have, and with the varied needs of different communities using Markdown, that seems quite difficult to achieve. I'd call that impossible.

Michel,

What you did at the beginning, I gather, was to port (and then extend)
an existing implementation, Markdown.pl.  The same will be possible with
CommonMark, which provides two implementations that use the same parsing
algorithm, one in portable C and one in 1540 lines of javascript (with
no library dependencies).  The javascript implementation doesn't use any
unusual javascript features and should be straightforward to
port to other dynamic languages: perl, python, ruby, PHP.  (Or you could
just use the javascript library client-side and skip the server-side
rendering.) Those who work with compiled languages will be able to use
the C library directly.

The parsers are both fast and accurate.  The original C parser I wrote
was about as fast as discount.  An expert C coder is now working on
otimizing it and, without changing the algorithm, has managed to make it
about as fast as sundown, which is very fast indeed (0.01 seconds to
parse a 1MB document, for example).  When optimization is complete, it
should be even faster.  The javascript parser is also very fast (0.28
seconds for the above-mentioned 1MB document, running in the Chrome
browser).  By comparising, Markdown.pl takes 250 seconds on the same
input, and pandoc takes 3.19 seconds.

John

_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20140908/4684eaa3/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: UM_logo_sig2-1.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 24684 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20140908/4684eaa3/attachment-0001.jpg>