It's a Markdown processor, right?
dev+ietf at seantek.com
Wed Sep 10 06:55:35 EDT 2014
On 9/7/2014 11:43 AM, Chris Lott wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf at seantek.com> wrote:
>> I have been using the term "Markdown processor"
> In the context of RFCs, etc., that sounds correct. The other things
> being discussed in this thread include things I think of as Markdown
> editors and in other cases Markdown libraries.
Thanks all for the comments.
For now, the balance is in favor of keeping "Markdown processor" in the
RFC (draft), so I'll stick with Markdown processor.
More information about the Markdown-Discuss