External reducing valves

NW Mailing List nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Tue Feb 12 14:31:00 EST 2019


 Thanks Bud, I was partially right on the draft - always good to hear from you and Ed & can count on logical answers about my favorite steam locomotives on my favorite railroad - Thanks Ron Hash
    On Tuesday, February 12, 2019, 10:57:42 AM EST, NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> wrote:  
 
 N&W tested the use of overfire air jets for road service in 1944 with 2151.  With heavy exhaust creating very good draft in road service, the railway found that the jets gave no appreciable benefit.  Overfire air jets did find favor for use on locomotives in yard service where draft was much more sporadic and often not heavy. Bud Jeffries From: NW Mailing List Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 4:54 PMTo: NW Mailing List Subject: Re: External reducing valves Speed didn’t have anything to do with the use of overfire air jets.  Rio Grande had some big Baldwin 4-6-6-4s with overfire jets. Their function was to kill smoke by introducing air over the fire to more thoroughly burn the fuel.  The first tests of them on the N&W were on a Z-1a (1352) and a W-2 0-8-0 (if I recall correctly the 680).  The tests were done at Bluefield Yard; the catenary was in full view.  There are at least two N&W photographs of the test.  I don’t know the date, but it was before the electrification was done away with. Ed King From: NW Mailing List via NW-Mailing-List Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 3:02 PMTo: NW Mailing List Cc: NW Mailing List Subject: Re: External reducing valves While on N&W steam : Most all the 0-8-0 switchers had over the fire air jets-- I'm guessing to aid in keeping a hot fire because of their slow mundane work vs the faster road locos had speed to help in firing. Is that the only reason for the jets ?  Ron Hash On Monday, February 11, 2019, 6:38:15 AM EST, NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> wrote:   #yiv4133944983 -- filtered {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}#yiv4133944983 filtered {font-family:calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv4133944983 p.yiv4133944983msonormal, #yiv4133944983 li.yiv4133944983msonormal, #yiv4133944983 div.yiv4133944983msonormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv4133944983 a:link, #yiv4133944983 span.yiv4133944983msohyperlink {color:#0563c1;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4133944983 a:visited, #yiv4133944983 span.yiv4133944983msohyperlinkfollowed {color:#954f72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4133944983 span.yiv4133944983emailstyle17 {font-family:sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv4133944983 .yiv4133944983msochpdefault {font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv4133944983 filtered {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv4133944983 div.yiv4133944983wordsection1 {}#yiv4133944983 Larry -  You have a few things confused here.  Alco developed an intercepting valve about 1910 for Mallet locomotives which automatically started the locomotive out in simple operation – in other words, live steam from the throttle into all four cylinders.  In order for this steam at high pressure not to cause the front engine to slip because of the larger cylinders, a reducing valve was incorporated to limit the pressure of this steam going to the bigger low-pressure cylinders so the front engine wouldn’t be slippery.  All N&W’s Alco Mallets had this feature and it was adopted as the standard for all the Mallets built by Roanoke.  Starting out in simple was automatic.  Also provided was a so-called “emergency” valve which could be operated by the engineer to keep the intercepting valve from functioning – in other words, to keep the engine operating in simple cycle until a difficult situation could be dealt with.  This is not the same as the emergency valve incorporated into the air brake valve. When the improved intercepting valve was developed (in the early 1950s, I believe – someone correct me if I’m wrong) an external reducing valve was used which appeared as a cylindrical gadget above the right high-pressure valve chest.  When this was done, control of the simpling function was no longer automatic but was given to the engineer in the form of a lever in the cab that he could use as conditions required.  But simpling still required the use of the reducing valve. The so-called “booster” valve which added a measured amount of throttle steam to the receiver to increase the power of the low-pressure engine was a separate valve under the control of the engineer so as to increase the power of the low-pressure engine after the engine had been changed from simple at starting and low speed to give the engine a bit more power under difficult circumstances.  All the 2100-series Y’s got this feature.  None of the earlier ones did, nor did the Z’s.  As these features were developed, all the 2100s were retrofitted so that N&W had 100 locomotives of equal capability.  If you had the 2101 out on the side of the mountain with tonnage, you would not be any better off with the 2200. These features made N&W’s 2100-series Mallets far and away more powerful than anyone else’s Mallets.  The Y-2 of 1918 pointed the way, and the USRA Y-3s and descendents were far and away faster than all the others.  When you consider that the horsepower curve of a Virginian AE 2-10-10-2 peaked out at 8 MPH and that of a Y-6 peaked out about 30 (at 5500 DBHP) you can see why N&W took the trouble to keep on developing the Y engines.  I know, the AE had ten thousand pounds more starting tractive effort than the 2100, but that figure was good for bragging rights and that was about all. Hope this helps and is not tMI. Ed King   From: NW Mailing List Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 8:29 PMTo: nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org Subject: External reducing valves 
N&W in early fifty’s started using the external reducing valves on the Y classes. Which enable them also to manually to control the intercepting valve and

put superheated steam into the LP receiver  While running it compound.  Anyone have an idea exactly  what locomotives actual got this modification? 

All Y6bs ??  I know some Y5s.   I have heard all Y6bs but at this late date seems to me to be improbable?  Thanks for any help.      

 

 

 

Thanks

 

Larry Evans

Kenova WV
________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/


________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/


________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20190212/ed8ff734/attachment.html>


More information about the NW-Mailing-List mailing list