Steel Water Tank Question

[NW Mailing List]

Ha!

On a related note, an old timer on a Circleville Facebook group typed a story about exploring the coal dock at Dorney (lots of pigeons), and also “swimming in the tank” as a kid. At the time, I thought only the tall raw water tanks were open. That would have taken cajones to climb all the way up there!  Even the shorter treated water tanks would have been a forty-fifty foot climb. And here I thought the petticoat junction people-swimming-in-a-tank was a myth.

I’ll remember the birds - but maybe a kid too...

Matt

> On May 26, 2025, at 10:10 PM, NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> wrote:
> 
> The water tower in Clare Yards in Cincinnati was an open top. I have photo rom above, so don't forget to model the dead birds floating on top. 
> Stephen Rineair
> 
> From: "NW Mailing List" <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
> To: "NW Mailing List" <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
> Cc: "NW Mailing List" <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2025 7:20:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Steel Water Tank Question
> 
> As a follow up, an answer to my question was hinted at in the instructions to a water tank kit produced by Tichy. A short paragraph stated that some railroads “in temperate climates” didn’t install tops to their tanks. So that at least confirmed that petticoat junction-style open top steel tanks were a real thing. 
> Today I also found the standard plans for the tanks in question in my original email, which confirmed the open top for the specific tanks I asked about:
> https://www.nwhs.org/archivesdb/detail.php?ID=13303
> 
> The “why” question is still an open one. Possibly as simple as reducing costs, and maybe soot wasn’t an issue. 
> 
> Matt Goodman
> Columbus, Ohio, US
> 
> On May 23, 2025, at 7:12 PM, Matt Goodman <mgoodman312 at icloud.com> wrote:
> 
> Hey everyone, 
> This past couple weeks I’ve been exploring the ODOT (Ohio Department of Transportation) Aerial Image Archive (here: https://gis3.dot.state.oh.us/ODOTAerialArchive/).
> 
> The first place I looked was the Dorney coaling station south of Columbus. The high water tank (the “raw” or untreated water) was open on top (as expected) but I was surprised to see that the two low 200K treated / storage tanks also appeared to be open. That surprised me, so I started down to check other locations.  
> 
> The nearest location with a similar set up is Portsmouth, and it too shows open tops on the treated tanks. 
> 
> To me this is unintuitive since the treated water would be exposed to soot - especially in the Portsmouth yard - which would then make its way through the locomotive appliances, etc. 
> 
> Does anyone have any comments on why this was done? Rain water harvesting? Maybe soot / cinder doesn’t really cause problems?
> 
> Attached are Dorney (top -1959) and Portsmouth (bottom - 1954)
> 
> <PastedGraphic-3.png>
> 
> <PastedGraphic-1.png>
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
> To change your subscription go to
> https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
> Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
> https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
> ________________________________________
> NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
> To change your subscription go to
> https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
> Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
> https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20250527/49fef843/attachment-0001.htm>