<html><head></head><body><div class="ydp78c6fd07yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:arial;font-size:16px;"><div></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">An interesting thing about hopper paint. N&W in the 70's utilized paint from seven manufacturers. On the hopper's side was a circle showing date painted and paint used. Example: PPG - SW and others. Harry Bundy</div><div><br></div>
</div><div id="ydpb1597081yahoo_quoted_8332462531" class="ydpb1597081yahoo_quoted"><div class="ydpb1597081yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:arial;font-size:16px;">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div class="ydpb1597081quoted-text-header">
On Tuesday, September 9, 2025 at 07:41:35 AM EDT, NW Mailing List via NW-Mailing-List <nw-mailing-list@nwhs.org> wrote:
</div>
</div><div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;border-left: 1px solid #ccc;padding-left: 8px;margin: 0px 0px 0px 8px" class="ydpb1597081inline_reply_quote_container" data-split-quote-node="true">
<div><br></div><div><br></div>
<div><div id="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448"><div>Hi Marty,<div>I grew up along the Pocahontas District M/L in the 70’s and 80’s. I saw the passing of many coal and hopper trains. I think your hypothesis about the prevalence of the half-moon paint scheme on hoppers in the 70’s is mostly correct. As I recall the trains never really had a uniform appearance. There was a continuous blend of paints schemes which included the 1971 NW, 1964 half moon, pre-1964 steam era, Virginian and NKP. The most common car types would’ve probably been the 100 ton H-11 family cars in the half moon scheme. I think the first new cars in the ‘71 NW scheme were the H11E’s followed by the H12’s. The occasional Virginian cars were the H14 3 bay 70 ton cars. The occasional NKP cars were the composite side H43 & H44 3 bay 70 ton cars. The N&W H10’s in steam era paint were also very common with some in half moon paint. There were also occasional early H-11’s in steam era paint. I hope this helps answer your question.</div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Chris Dalton</div><div>Bluefield WV<br clear="none" id="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448lineBreakAtBeginningOfSignature"><div dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone</div><div dir="ltr"><div id="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448yqtfd79568" class="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448yqt8002075732"><br clear="none"><blockquote type="cite">On Sep 8, 2025, at 7:03 PM, NW Mailing List via NW-Mailing-List <nw-mailing-list@nwhs.org> wrote:<br clear="none"><br clear="none"></blockquote></div></div><div id="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448yqtfd31021" class="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448yqt8002075732"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:16px;" class="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448ydp5adcc00cyahoo-style-wrap"><div></div>
<div dir="ltr">I have no clue as to which hopper paint scheme was most prevalent during any given era, but that won't stop me from commenting. Ha Ha. I would suggest that certain paint schemes are more prevalent in the photographic record due to selection bias. Personally, I never liked the NW "stick lettering" scheme, therefore, I rarely photographed equipment painted in that scheme, after all, film is expensive and I wasn't about to waste it on something I didn't like. The same can be said for book publishers. They print the pictures they like best and leave out the rest. An absence of stick lettered equipment could simply be due to the selection bias of the photographers, authors, and editors, not any particular absence of any specific equipment. </div><div dir="ltr"><br clear="none"></div><div dir="ltr">Also, equipment would be painted in any particular scheme if it was 1) new, or 2) just receiving a major rebuild. Existing equipment, with the possible exception of motor power, just was not repainted until it was absolutely necessary to do so. </div><div dir="ltr"><br clear="none"></div><div dir="ltr">Jerry Kay, Jarratt, Virginia</div><div><br clear="none"></div>
</div><div id="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448ydp99226a57yahoo_quoted_7711850639" class="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448ydp99226a57yahoo_quoted"><div style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:16px;" class="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448ydp99226a57yahoo-style-wrap">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div class="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448ydp99226a57quoted-text-header">
On Monday, September 8, 2025 at 02:57:41 PM EDT, NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list@nwhs.org> wrote:
</div>
</div><div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;border-left:1px solid #ccc;padding-left:8px;margin:0px 0px 0px 8px;" class="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448ydp99226a57inline_reply_quote_container">
<div><br clear="none"></div><div><br clear="none"></div>
<div><div id="ydpb1597081yiv0771649448ydp99226a57yiv9321209008"><div>I grew up in the 80s, so I didn't get to witness 1970s era N&W firsthand, but it's probably my favorite N&W era for diesels. While there are a variety of sources to help identify what classes of hopper cars were in service, I'm curious about the mix of paint schemes. Looking through "Norfolk And Western In Color Volume 3", it looks like the 1960s era half-moon/hamburger schemes, albeit with consolidated lube plates and other updated data, were actually more common than cars in the NW scheme that would have been the current scheme at the time. <div><br clear="none"></div><div>Can anyone else confirm this, or know of other sources I should look at?</div><div><br clear="none"></div><div>Thanks</div><div>Marty Flick</div></div>
</div>________________________________________<br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="mailto:NW-Mailing-List@nwhs.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">NW-Mailing-List@nwhs.org</a><br clear="none">To change your subscription go to<br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list</a><br clear="none">Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at<br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/</a><br clear="none"></div>
</div>
</div></div><span>________________________________________</span><br clear="none"><span>NW-Mailing-List@nwhs.org</span><br clear="none"><span>To change your subscription go to</span><br clear="none"><span>https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list</span><br clear="none"><span>Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at</span><br clear="none"><span>https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/</span><br clear="none"></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div>________________________________________<br><a href="mailto:NW-Mailing-List@nwhs.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">NW-Mailing-List@nwhs.org</a><br>To change your subscription go to<br><a href="https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list</a><br>Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at<br><a href="https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/</a><br></div>
</div>
</div></div></body></html>