CODE 83 RAIL
    NW Modeling List 
    nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org
       
    Thu Feb  1 07:36:53 EST 2007
    
    
  
The mainline is on cork roadbed.. my yard the track is laid on foamboard without any cork roadbed under it, sidings are more or less the same way.
Bob Welsh
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: NW Modeling List 
  To: NW Modeling List 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:37 PM
  Subject: RE: CODE 83 RAIL
  I've never tried this but it seems you could put a tapered shim under the track (ties and all) and then let your ballast cover it.  How are the transitions usually made between mainline and sidings/yards?
  Jim Slack
  Wichita, KS
  -----Original Message-----
  From: NW Modeling List [mailto:nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 6:37 PM
  To: NW Modeling List
  Subject: Re: CODE 83 RAIL
  I have a question.. I have a lot of code 100 already laid... using code 83 to continue would be nice, but is there a transitional piece of track or something to use to bridge the two together without an unsightly bump in the railjoint?
  Bob WElsh
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: NW Modeling List 
    To: NW Modeling List 
    Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:56 AM
    Subject: Re: CODE 83 RAIL
    FWIW, I am using Atlas 83 for the first time and love it.  It seems ot be much easier to work with than the Atlas 100 I have used in the past, plus I think that it looks a lot more realistic.  For my turnouts and crossovers, I have been using Shinohara instead of the Atlas.  I used some Atlas pieces and replaced them b/c I just didn't like the way the cars would bobble going over the frogs.  
    Will
    NW Modeling List <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org> wrote:
      As the big day approaches to start laying track, any thoughts on the best size?  Hopefully folks with more experience can advise if you've had good results with code 83 (or smaller???) from an operability, construction, cost and appearance standpoint?  Any feelings on brand names that have worked well for you?  At the cost of some of those #8 turnouts I sure don't want to make a mistake!  (Even worse to have a J fall 4 feet to the ground).
      Thanks!!
      Ed Svitil
      ________________________________________
      NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org
      To change your subscription go to
      http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    The fish are biting.
    Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ________________________________________
    NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org
    To change your subscription go to
    http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.17/661 - Release Date: 1/30/2007 11:30 PM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  ________________________________________
  NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org
  To change your subscription go to
  http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.17/661 - Release Date: 1/30/2007 11:30 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/attachments/20070201/5226d52c/attachment-0001.html 
    
    
More information about the NW-Modeling-List
mailing list