PSC OR PCM Y6b

NW Modeling List nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org
Fri Aug 17 19:14:50 EDT 2007


Dear Mr. Gemperline,
Attached you will find a jpeg version of the instructions for
changing the front coupler on the BLI A.
Sincerley,
Toney Minter

NW Modeling List wrote:

> I have the PCM Y6b. I bought it last year. It is a stunningly beautiful

> model. Jim is correct that both engines swivel. The PCM does not have

> traction tires. Depending on who you ask that can be good or bad. I can pull

> about 15 Broadway Limited Coal Hoppers or Stewart 34ft Coal Hoppers (all

> weighted to NMRA Standards) up a 2.2 percent grade on my clubs layout. My

> Broadway Limited A with traction tires can about 30+ cars up the same grade.

> I just wish I would not have lost the instructions on how to put a front

> coupler on the "A"

>

> A.J. Gemperline

>

>

>>

>> Message: 1

>>"

>>

>> The PCM model is beautiful. I have one, and am well pleased with the

>> detail. The PSC brass model has one advantage, however. The rear engine

>> is rigidly mounted to the boiler, which is prototypically correct,

>> whereas the PCM model follows current model practice of allowing both

>> engines to swivel. If this matters to you, then the PSC is your choice.

>> If not, I would go with the PCM. Jim Nichols

>>

>> NW Modeling List wrote:

>>

>> > All,

>> >

>> > I am interested in purchasing either the PSC Brass Y6b that came

>> > out in the mid to late 90s or the PCM model recently released.

>> > Any comments on which is the more prototypically correct model? I

>> > realize PCS is brass, however the diecast/plastic models have

>> > greatly improved in the past 10 or so years. Money is not the

>> > issue here, although if the PCM is the better bet, I sure would

>> > not mind the savings.

>> > I looked over the past archives and did not see this question

>> > addressed in any detail.

>> >

>> > Thanks for any help in advance! Steve Clark

>> >

>> >

>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> >

>> >________________________________________

>> >NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org

>> >To change your subscription go to

>> >http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list

>> >Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at

>> >http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/

>> >

>>

>> -------------- next part --------------

>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

>> URL:

>> <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/attachments/20070815/072a948

>> 2/attachment.html>

>>

>> ------------------------------

>>

>> Message: 2

>> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:48:08 -0400

>> From: NW Modeling List <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>

>> Subject: Re: PSC or PCM Brass Y6b

>> To: NWHS <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>

>> Message-ID: <C2E9DBE8.A8A%rjfolsom at bellsouth.net>

>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

>>

>> Steve,

>>

>> Part of the decision depends on whether you want the ultimate detailed

>> showpiece or a more practical model that runs well and pulls realistic sized

>> trains. I bought a PSC brass class A around that same time period. It was

>> exquisitely detailed, with the pony and trailing trucks equalized with the

>> drivers, removable lids on the sand domes, sprung trailing truck, openable

>> lid on tender, etc. The problems started when I tried to operate it pulling

>> modest trains of 30+ cars. It was slippery, and tended to short out on even

>> broad curves of 32? radius due to the close tolerances of the brake hangers.

>> The next thing I knew, the wormgear (made of brass) in the front engine

>> failed. I had NWSL custom make some replacement wormgears of delrin. Then,

>> after that, the brass universal joints wore out. It was a nightmare.

>> Admittedly, there are extensive 1.5% grades on my layout, but I still think

>> that the power train was far too fragile. I think that the BL class A or

>> the PCM Y look very good, and are far more rugged and reliable.

>>

>> Bob Folsom

>> Clemson, SC

>>

>>

>> On 8/15/07 9:48 PM, "NW Modeling List" <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org> wrote:

>>

>> > All,

>> >

>> > I am interested in purchasing either the PSC Brass Y6b that came out in

>> the

>> > mid to late 90s or the PCM model recently released. Any comments on which

>> is

>> > the more prototypically correct model? I realize PCS is brass, however

>> the

>> > diecast/plastic models have greatly improved in the past 10 or so years.

>> > Money is not the issue here, although if the PCM is the better bet, I sure

>> > would not mind the savings.

>> > I looked over the past archives and did not see this question addressed in

>> any

>> > detail.

>> >

>> > Thanks for any help in advance! Steve Clark

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > ________________________________________

>> > NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org

>> > To change your subscription go to

>> > http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list

>> > Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at

>> > http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/

>>

>>

>> -------------- next part --------------

>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

>> URL:

>> <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/attachments/20070816/b07c2c7

>> f/attachment.htm>

>>

>> ------------------------------

>>

>> ________________________________________

>> NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org

>> To change your subscription go to

>> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list

>> Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at

>> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling

>>

>>

>> End of NW-Modeling-List Digest, Vol 42, Issue 7

>> ***********************************************

>

> ________________________________________

> NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org

> To change your subscription go to

> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list

> Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at

> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/

>



--
Toney Minter E-mail:tminter at nrao.edu
NRAO - Green Bank Phone: +1 304 456 2275
1 Observatory Road Fax: +1 304 456 2170
PO Box 2 WWW: www.gb.nrao.edu/~tminter
Green Bank WV 24944
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BLI A front coupler.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 66400 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/attachments/20070817/07da79cb/attachment-0001.jpg>


More information about the NW-Modeling-List mailing list