[StBernard] Demolition
Westley Annis
westley at da-parish.com
Tue Jan 10 22:37:45 EST 2006
Westley,
Thanks for taking the time to address this question. It's very important to
those of us who worked hard to pay our flood insurance premiums. But I still
have a question about number one; I now own this home, I used the proceeds
from the flood insurance to pay the balance of the mortgage, therefore there
is no mortgage balance. Using your reasoning, I should recieve at least 60%
of the pre Katrina price - boy I hope you're right!!! If this is correct I
would actually have recieved a pay-off of 138% of my homes' value, if you
add the amount recieved from the flood disbursement to the value recieved
from the Baker Plan.
This sounds too good to be true!
Butch
>-----------------------------------------------------
>Butch, I'll answer the best I can, but realize I'm only guessing here.
>
>See responses below.
>
>Westley
>
>-----Original Message-----
>
>Westley or Craig,
>Help! I am hopelessly confused. I had planned on driving to the parish
>tommorrow and to sign a demolition form. However, I just got finished
>listening to Richard Baker on WWL radio. I am more confused now than ever.
>I
>
>really need three questions answered;
>
>1. My flood insurance paid off the mortgage on my home and I was left with
>a
>
>small amount of equity. The insurance value was about 78% of the fair
>market
>
>value of my home. I now hold the title to a home with 10-30% structural
>damage and do not intend to rebuild. The home is in Meraux.
>I have not gutted the home and do not intend to do so. I have placed it on
>the market and have For Sale signs posted on the home. Richard Baker stated
>on the radio that the minimum offer on homes will be 60% of pre-Katrina
>value, will this apply to someone like myself, who has recieved a flood
>insurance settlement? Every time that I have heard this question asked of
>him, he doesn't answer the question, or maybe I ain't smart enough to
>understand the answer?
>
>Answer: The way I understand the process to work is this: PreKatrina Value
>minus Current Mortgage Balance equals Your Equity. You should receive at
>least 60% of this value.
>
>2. I certainly want to do the right thing for the parish and any neighbors
>who do intend to rebuild in the area. My first thought was to sign the
>demolition form and let the parish demolish the structure. That wouldn't
>happen for awhile and if I got an offer on the property with the structure
>I
>
>could stop the demolition. But if the Baker Plan does get through Congress
>I
>
>suppose that it may be in my best interest to let the structure stand, it
>might be worth more?
>
>Answer: Since the Baker Plan will be buying based off of PreKatrina values,
>I don't think the structure being there or not will have any bearing on the
>monies you are offered.
>
>3. If the Baker plan passes and does benefit everyone whether they have
>insurance or not, doesn't it cause a problem with the expedited demolition
>that the parish seems to favor?
>
>Answer: Basically the same as number 2. Actually, I think the Baker Plan
>would rather have the homes demolished. This lets FEMA pay for that
>portion
>of the cleanup, meaning the LRC would have more funds available to buy
>homes. Plus I think it helps give a larger area for developers to have a
>blank slate to work with.
>
>
More information about the StBernard
mailing list