[StBernard] Jindal says Craig should resign but not Vitter?

[Westley Annis]

Jim,

How do you know about this diaper thing with Vitter?  I'm telling you this 
is more disgusting and and sick than I thought.  I thought I've been 
watching the news enough but my dad's been in the hospital so maybe I missed

this one.  Did you get this from a reliable news source and you know it is 
not just rumor?  Where'd you hear about this?

Laurie



>-----------------------------------------------------

>Oh God John; now that I find funny.  If only poor ole Dave had gotten his

>poon-tang in Nevada!  No crime!

>

>The thing that is oh-so-funny to me is how these people are going to

>"protect" us from the bad old world and its evil ways yet they don't

>practice what they preach.  Of course the fact that they have been all

>Republicans lately just yields to me a certain degree of schadenfreude.  If

>you can't (or don't) practice what you preach...SHUT UP!  For me personally

>it's just something to giggle at:  Duke Cunningham, Mark Foley, Newt

>Gingrich, with his yet additional affair, Ted Haggard and now Sen. Craig.

>

>Further, when the news broke about Vitter, I was waiting to see what the

>members of this list would have to say/write.  I don't recall seeing

>anything.  I didn't post anything because this list seems to be made up of

>mostly Republicans (note-I did not say conservatives).  But; not a peep.

>

>Also, I was really surprised not to see more references to this with 

>Vitter:

>

>     the fact that David Vitter visited the DC Madam's prostitutes was bad

>enough.     But now we are learning that Vitter was shelling out $300 a pop

>to wear             diapers while he was being unfaithful to his wife and

>living the life of an               extreme hypocrite.

>

>     Diaper Dave Vitter and his wife's hypocrisy knows no bounds. As 

>several

>other     New Orleans Madam's have now linked Diaper Dave to frequenting

>prostitutes.

>

>     Hey, isn't that a crime ?

>

>     Some of you may say as I initially did that this is not an issue 

>worthy

>of             discussion. I mean, so what if the cat got out of the bag

>about another kinky     Republican congress person who in this case likes 

>to

>pay women to dress         him up in Pampers (or is he a Huggie man?).

>

>     But the hypocrisy in this case is so extreme that it needs to be

>exposed.           Check out his 2004 campaign ad:

>

>On a blog I read, I saw a link to this article on a conservative website:

>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1889601/posts

>

>It's from the freeper website free republic.  It's an interesting read,

>though I doubt most republicans will buy what the writer puts forth.

>

>Honestly John, it makes no difference to me.  Both were playing around

>outside of their marriages and whether it was with a guy or a gal I just 

>get

>a kick out of the phoniness of it all.

>

>Jim