[StBernard] Class Trip (not for Jerry)

[Westley Annis]

"As she lifted one, she couldn't help but notice that he was unusually well
endowed. Trying not to show that she was staring the teacher said, 'You must
be in the 5th grade.'" --anonymous coward.

Jer Responds.

How sad.

Firstly, let me introduce a little class act behavior in what I deem loss of
disrespect for those who use a public vehicle to exercise one's freedom of
speech to the point of abuse.

Again, which idiot would post this spot of nicety? The coward was either
ashamed to post their real name or knew the outrage would upset Christians
and those who love God not only at Christmastime, but anytime. Shame.

Secondly, teachers are not nurses. They should not be holding the private
parts of 3-5th graders who should have been house broken in this case. Using
children in this example of humor borderlines pedophile activity. Is
everyone who reads this material tasteful to applaud the content inside?? If
my 10 yr old came to me and said someone was holding his private to help him
urinate, I would be outraged enough to have the teacher's job and/or lawsuit
to teach someone who has been assigned to a trust of my child's welfare. If
the roles were reversed and a male teacher was in the bathroom with a young
10 yr old girl to hold her while she urinates, there would be such an
outrage (and I wouldn't blame anyone in this case, not just a male child,
but female who would be involved in the action.

The fact that some teacher (male or female) would "notice endowment" makes
the joke a sick one as well as someone who would post it thinking everyone
would cherish such filth.

The enclosure of: "not for jerry" doesn't apply to just me, but should apply
to everyone who supports decency with children and a joke aimed at
respectful teachers who should understand when they are being targeted as
blunt-ends of a foul-smelling attempt to make everyone laugh. It's not a
warning to me. Being an adult also doesn't exempt one from being bombast
with smut. Sure, no one had to read it. But, everyone who cherishes
discipline and taste in where a post is laid should equally feel anger and
outrage.

This writer knew of my disagreement or would not have posted a caveat to me.
I don't write for everyone as it is of my opinion only. But to know I'm
targeted specifically is quite an insult to me personally. It's a putdown
for sure to bash one of many whom abhor indecency in the guise of
"cuteness". Animals don't act this way and neither should humanity who has
been given a choice and chooses to insult God with directness. 

I can't blame Westley as free-speech is part of free-thought in publication.
However, should this writer continue to abuse a decent site for the sake of
getting his/her stimulation through soft-porn writings, God's input to a
conscience. It's why he/she has been provided a brain.

--jer---