[StBernard] School Board Race Heats Up in Saint Bernard

[Westley Annis]

It makes a difference to me. As a very young candidate, I haven't heard
(only recently been able to apply or vote herself but Times-Picayune has her
as a democrat (Many of us now are in the knowledge/belief that "democrats"
are not the same as that of their grandfathers and have gradually moved 99
points to the left and the term seems now defunct. In fact, a great majority
hasn't realized how political correctness, liberalized and socialized
acceptance worldwide were moved leftward as extremists over the past 100
yrs., .Darleen Asevedo-no party, and .Louis Wineski III-R(epublican) if
there's any specific political persuasion. 

Many candidates like to remain "neutral" to voters as not to split the vote
and thus decrease any chances of winning. It's a common political strategy
more than not in most races at the local level. However, it does make a
difference if one takes a side on a matter that does determine the mindset
of any leader in a public role. IT wouldn't matter if the employed position
was that of an industrial laborer, because politics is neutralized at the
hands of a machine or tools where political persuasion is not calculated
into how the equipment would operate or not.

Children are our most precious asset, are they not? The school board, along
with its school board superintendent Voitier are the parish's leaders of an
institution/school system which teaches St. Bernard Parish's children and
thus has the influence as to their future of political persuasion. 

With so many school boards across the nation teaching kids
"social-institutionalized and indoctrination of socialized education" in a
political sense of liberal socialists, it is fair to say they dictate what
is learned by parish children.

Knowing political affiliation will help parents know educational direction
that kids will be led. I don't care how "good" a teacher is at teaching, it
must be know as well WHAT the kids will be taught.

Also, with national unions running teachers directives, we have to ask
ourselves: "will my kid be indoctrinated" as a "nudge" forward (gradual, as
not to alarm conservatives) into what the leaders' political beliefs feel
are politically correct; Or, will it be parents who wish to teach kids
political beliefs, creationism vs. scientific-monkey-minded Darwin theory as
the specific choice (a belief best taught by parents as to whether
scientific creation replaces moral conception of higher religious creation
influenced by a parent) of how man came to be. Finally, will the kids be
given "choices" in "elementary schools" as to whether they want sex
protection if asked for such? Oh, It goes on and on as more
liberal/socialistic ideas are accepted by our school-district leaders.

Yes, it is correct to know who and what affiliation is ruling and
establishing policies for our children.

Conservatives know this. How is it that liberals don't get it? It could be
because they haven't completely fulfilled their agenda until all kids, who
will be the next generation of voters and nationalied-world-view socialistic
attitudes which will supplant the future adult into easily accepting
socialized education.

It matters.

--jer--

-----------------------------------------------------
Is Vandenborre a Republican or a Democrat?

 
Just curious, why is that of interest for a local School Board?