[Woodcarver] SmugMug photo gallery...

[Dave_Kratzer at sil.org]

I like the option of the Large size or Originial size. There are times 
when it is nice to zoom in and see the detail of the carving. I especially 
like that in Bills DVD Books. You can zoom in and see exactly what was 
done.

/Dave

Dave Kratzer
http://www.kratzerkomments.com 
http://www.picturetrail.com/dave_kratzer
http://www.wycliffe.org 

Wycliffe Mission: To see a Bible translation program in progress in every 
language still needing one by 2025.
Wycliffe Vision: That God’s Word is accessible to all people in a language 
that speaks to their heart.
 "The greatest missionary is the Bible in the mother tongue.  It never 
needs a furlough, and is never considered a foreigner."  --Cameron 
Townsend



woodcarver-bounces at six.pairlist.net 
Sent by: woodcarver-bounces at six.pairlist.net
01/12/2007 02:50 PM
Please respond to
woodcarver at six.pairlist.net


To
abkinnaman at earthlink.net, woodcarver at six.pairlist.net
cc

Subject
Re: [Woodcarver] SmugMug photo gallery...






Byron:

Thanks for the advice.

The idea of the larger images is, or course, to allow for larger/closer 
views of the carvings.

Smugmug allow enough bandwidth for this, so storage isn't a problem.

Images that are uploaded to the site are converted into S, M, L and 
Original sizes. The default, of course is the thumbnail (S) size and the 
medium size. These and the L size are all smaller images. The Original 
size depends on the original file size...
The viewer gets to choose which image he views... which is what I like 
about the site.

Take another look and hopefully confirm what I've observed, OK?

Thanks for taking the time.

Bill

My books are for sale at: http://wwwoodcarver.com/Books/index.html
W.F. Judt,
46 Harvard Cres,
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan,
S7H3R1
PH: 306-373-6649
bjudt at sasktel.net
Website: http://www.wwwoodcarver.com


On 12-Jan-07, at 12:57 PM, Byron wrote:

Bill,
 
I suggest you rethink web size photos.  Community web site photo sharing 
try to limit the photo size to no larger than 300Kbyte.  Anything in 
the near 100Kbyte is plenty big enough to view on the average monitor.   
The larger pictures just eat up bandwidth with 0 gain to the viewer.  In 
fact many browsers have to be reset to see the entire picture on the 
screen for 300k pictures.  
 
I manage several web sites and never use any graphic larger than 200kbyte 
and try to stay close to 100kbyte.   Anything larger is just a waste.
 
Also, you must remember that not all people have high speed.   A 1megabyte 
picture will take so long to download that those on dial-up won't bother. 
 
 
 


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.9/623 - Release Date: 1/11/2007 
3:33 PM


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/woodcarver/attachments/20070112/1442477a/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00768.txt
Url: http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/woodcarver/attachments/20070112/1442477a/attachment.txt