early diesels on the Abingdon (was): Y,A, J on the Abingdon Branch?

[NW Modeling List]

EMD GP9, Alco RS3, Alco RS11 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "NW Modeling List" <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org> 
To: "NW Modeling List" <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org> 
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 8:06:33 PM 
Subject: early diesels on the Abingdon (was): Y,A, J on the Abingdon Branch? 

Thanks for the steam info! 

What type diesels would of worked the Abingdon Branch after the end of steam? 
Late 50's to early 60's period. 

Thanks, 
Gnee 


On May 19, 2011 at 10:35 PM NW Modeling List <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org> wrote: 


> Class A or J, most certainly never, very doubtful of a Y on the 

> Abingdon branch due to axle loadings 

> 

> I happen to have my binder of Radford Division employee timetables 

> from 1924-1941 out on my desk, so I picked a couple out 

> 

> Radford Division Employee Timetable No. 22, effective July 6, 1924 

> Tonnage Ratings 

> Abingdon Branch 

> Only lists Class G and Class T 

> 

> Radford Division No. 12, effective May 5, 1935 

> Only lists Class M and Class W 

> 

> North Carolina Branch 

> Class G, M, M-2 or Z 

> 

> Radford Division 22, effective May 4, 1941 

> Abingdon Branch 

> Only Class W and Class M engines 

> 

> North Carolina Branch 

> Class Y-3, Z, M-2, M or G 

> 

> Ken Miller 

> 

> On May 19, 2011, at 7:47 PM, NW Modeling List wrote: 

> 

> > Per my Dad recollections, Y’s did operate over the North Carolina 

> > extension. 

> > 

> > Ed Painter – Narrows, VA 

> > 

> > From: nw-modeling-list-bounces at nwhs.org 

> > [mailto:nw-modeling-list-bounces at nwhs.org 

> > ] On Behalf Of NW Modeling List 

> > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 6:04 PM 

> > To: NW Modeling List 

> > Subject: Re: Y,A, J on the Abingdon Branch? 

> > 

> > Hi Gene; 

> > 

> > A and J - definitely no. Too big/wide/rigid. 

> > 

> > Y - maybe - they were very flexible. 

> > 

> > Nigel 

> > ----- Original Message ----- 

> > ....... 

> > Quick question: Did any Y's, A's, or J's operate on the branch? I 

> > think I 

> > remember reading that they were too heavy to go over the bridges. 

> > ........ 

> > ________________________________________ 

> > NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org 

> > To change your subscription go to 

> > http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list 

> > Browse the NW-Modeling-List archives at 

> > http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/ 

> 

> ________________________________________ 

> NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org 

> To change your subscription go to 

> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list 

> Browse the NW-Modeling-List archives at 

> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/ 

Gene Bowker http://genebowker.com/ 
The Railroad Examiner - http://railfan.biz 
________________________________________ 
NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org 
To change your subscription go to 
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list 
Browse the NW-Modeling-List archives at 
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/attachments/20110520/45db5358/attachment.html>