[game_preservation] Game Database question

[Billy Cain]

One more thought occurred to me: games released in Germany can't (or
at least couldn't) have red blood in them.

Is that a variant people would be interested in?

Re: collections of games - EA used to do multiple game titles in one
box. Sometimes with one copy of each game on a single disc and
sometimes in other ways. There are many variations on this. For
example, other countries have region encoding, multi-languages,
packaging variations, in-box prizes that differ from the originals,
etc.

The variations seem endless to me, and I have been a collector of a
lot of odd stuff for a long time.

I have donated a lot of my Origin stuff to Joe Garrity of the Origin
Museum, my Wing Commander stuff to the Wing Comander CIC, and I am
preparing to donate a large video game collection to the University of
Texas' Video Game Archive. I believe in what you ALL are doing - it's
vital.

Keep up the great work, all of you! I'll go back to lurking again
until I believe I have something worth saying. :)
Billy

On 3/14/10, Henry Lowood <lowood at stanford.edu> wrote:

> All,

>

> Lots of interesting points here.   I'm going to just make some quick

> comments and notes:

>

> 1. The issue of standards did come up at the Roundtable as a desired

> area to work on as a group.   It's not really possible to go into depth

> at the Roundtable, but now that the issue is on the table, we can think

> about how to organize our efforts.

>

> 2. In formulating standards, libraries should be involved, and indeed

> the Preserving Virtual Worlds devoted some time to discussion of this

> topic at our recent close-out meeting.  If a second phase is funded, we

> will devote some attention to this issue.  We also talked about

> available databases and how to involve them, e.g. Mobygames.  Jim, would

> you or someone else in the Mobygames group be interested in becoming

> part of the conversation in our project group?  Jan, how about you?

> Anybody else working in this area that we should include?

>

> 3. Much of the discussion here about versions might benefit from a peak

> at what book cataloging.  Not so much the standard AACR2 rules, but

> analytical bibliography.  I'm thinking of Philip Gaskell's /New

> Introduction to Bibliography /as a good example of how deep descriptive

> bibliography works.  Note that many of the issues around variants,

> pirated editions, etc., also come up in the rare book world.

>

> 4. I haven't read all the posts, so forgive me if I am making a dopey

> comment here: In the discussion about "versions" so far, I missed a

> treatment of what are most commonly called versions, that is, patches.

> This is a growing issue, esp. with respect to on-line games that are

> frequently patched.   It used to be mostly a PC games issue, but not

> anymore.

>

> Those are just my quick thoughts for now.   My main point is that if

> there is sufficient interest in a focused effort here, let's get a

> working group together and team up with Preserving Virtual Worlds

> folks.   I'm happy to be a go-between, esp. since I have a foot in both

> worlds.

>

> Henry

>

> Devin Monnens wrote:

>> Let me begin by emphasizing something that I think should have been

>> emphasized at the roundtable more: we need to work on standards that

>> all libraries and archives can agree on.

>>

>> For cataloging, I would go back to 'what is the minimum amount of data

>> required to indicate how the game is identified'? Beyond this, we

>> would want to know 'what does it take to run this game as intended?'

>>

>> Jim makes a couple good points here as well.

>>

>> First, how different do two copies of a game have to be for them to be

>> considered different games? Golden Axe on HG101 is a good example of a

>> comparison. I don't know where I'd even begin here.

>>

>> http://hg101.kontek.net/goldenaxe/goldenaxe.htm

>>

>> An easier example. In the NES and Famicom versions of Castlevania 3,

>> you have graphical changes like the vampire frogs (!) replaced with

>> hunchbacks. The game functions identically despite this graphical

>> change, but it could be argued there is a different interpretation if

>> there are hunchbacks. However, the handshake switch does change some

>> meaning in the game (Trevor is righty or lefty/he is shaking Sypha's

>> hand or holding it delicately). On a more dramatic level, the music is

>> superior in the Famicom version, so this is a something notable that

>> could affect a player's perception (better music makes players think

>> the game is better). However, there is also a rule change where the

>> damage taken is different - in the US version, damage is based on game

>> level while in the Famicom, it is based on what kind of enemy hits you

>> (which makes later stages easier). I'm not sure I would consider these

>> big enough differences though to warrant calling it a different game,

>> more like different version numbers. With the Golden Axe examples, I

>> think there's greater leeway in calling a port a different game. There

>> simply isn't an analogue to this in film or novels because the content

>> doesn't really change if it's on vhs or dvd or in times new roman

>> versus arial.

>>

>> http://www.castlevaniadungeon.net/Games/cv3foreign.html

>>

>> The second I think is this dismissal of piracy categories, and here I

>> think there needs some clarification. Game lists such as 'Goodtools'

>> can be very useful in documenting changes between two games. However,

>> these are not currently tied to metadata so we don't know exactly what

>> changes were made or where each version came from (usually). I

>> wouldn't completely dismiss this resource as a byte-to-byte comparison

>> of the games can indicate if there is a difference in two games for

>> the same platform.

>>

>>

>> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Jim Leonard <trixter at oldskool.org

>> <mailto:trixter at oldskool.org>> wrote:

>>

>>     On 3/14/2010 3:55 PM, Jan Baart wrote:

>>

>>         Mobygames basically ignores the concept of

>>         game versions and just throws it all into one kettle.

>>

>>

>>     Considering I designed MobyGames to do exactly the opposite, I'm

>>     curious what you mean.  The main screens certainly try to

>>     summarize all platforms so that comparisons can be made at a

>>     glance, but the specific information is under the hood and is

>>     accessible.  Are you talking about different platforms for the

>>     same game?  (For example, Jones in the Fast Lane has a DOS version

>>     as well as a Windows 3.x version, and each are listed as a

>>     platform)  Or do you mean different releases of the same game?  If

>>     the latter, then different revisions of a game can be noted along

>>     with their version, date, and comments (see

>>

>> http://www.mobygames.com/game/dos/kings-quest-v-absence-makes-the-heart-go-yonder/release-info

>>     for an example)

>>

>>     As for your differentiation between EGA vs. VGA as a "release",

>>     both were included in the packaging (see

>>

>> http://www.mobygames.com/game/dos/kings-quest-v-absence-makes-the-heart-go-yonder/cover-art/gameCoverId,43069/

>>     ) so I'm not sure why those should be categorized as different

>>     releases.

>>

>>     One of the problems I saw in the late 1990s was that game listings

>>     were dominated more by pirate group releases and not actual proper

>>     publisher releases.  As less and less people have access to the

>>     original as years go by, this only gets worse.  Both of your

>>     examples point to a pirate-centric view.  I'm not calling you a

>>     pirate, btw -- *I* was certainly a raging pirate in the 1980s, I

>>     ran the first abandonware site sent a cease and desist letter by

>>     the (then) IDSA, and I still crack and release stuff I can get my

>>     hands on today that doesn't seem to have made it into the wild.

>>      But despite my love of reverse-engineering and my desire to

>>     preserve history, categorizing games based on what pirate groups

>>     distributed doesn't seem very sound.

>>

>>

>>         What I'm basically wondering is this. Do you guys think of

>>         these as

>>         different games or just versions of games? After all, as food for

>>         thought, these often differ more than ports from one system to

>>         another

>>         and such ports always get separate entries in game databases.

>>

>>

>>     I'll illustrate my beliefs with the most difficult example I can

>>     think of:  Jones in the Fast Lane.  That game had two package

>>     releases:

>>

>>            - DOS, floppy, 3.5" and 5.25", EGA and VGA

>>            - CDROM talkie edition with Windows 3.1 and DOS binaries

>>

>>     I would call these two different platforms, with two "versions"

>>     per platform.  That's not 100% accurate since the DOS and Windows

>>     CDROM edition are in the same package, but it's close enough for

>>     the purposes of our discussion.

>>

>>     A different example is comparing Heart of China to King's Quest V.

>>     Heart of China was published in two separate packages, one EGA/CGA

>>     and another VGA.  KQV was a single package with both sets of

>>     disks.  So I would say that Heart of China is two different

>>     (publisher) releases, while KQV is one release despite having two

>>     sets of disks in it.

>>

>>     The bigger problem you pose is:  How different does a game have to

>>     get on different platforms before it's not the same game?  When we

>>     built MobyGames' platform support, we made sure to make things

>>     easily comparable, because I find it historically fascinating to

>>     see how a game was re-implemented on various platforms.  Take

>>     Elite as an example, and poke through

>>     http://www.mobygames.com/game/elite/screenshots for some

>>     interesting comparisons.  It's interesting to see how it was

>>     altered for the limitations of the platform it was destined for

>>     (apple II has wireframe only, etc.) but it's obvious it's the same

>>     game.

>>

>>     Now, take "Tomb Raider" for the Gameboy:

>>

>> http://www.mobygames.com/game/gameboy-color/tomb-raider_/screenshots/gameShotId,256516/

>>      Despite the common name and character art, it is clearly not a

>>     port of the original; it is more inspired by it.  So it shouldn't

>>     be included with the main, consolidated entry, and it isn't.

>>

>>     The Elite example illustrates why MobyGames needs more volunteers

>>     -- the original Elite was for the BBC Micro which, despite the

>>     many platforms that *are* listed, isn't yet a supported platform

>>     in MobyGames.

>>     --

>>     Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org <mailto:trixter at oldskool.org>)

>>              http://www.oldskool.org/

>>     Help our electronic games project:           http://www.mobygames.com/

>>     Or check out some trippy MindCandy at     http://www.mindcandydvd.com/

>>     A child borne of the home computer wars:

>>     http://trixter.wordpress.com/

>>

>>     _______________________________________________

>>     game_preservation mailing list

>>     game_preservation at igda.org <mailto:game_preservation at igda.org>

>>     http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_preservation

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> --

>> Devin Monnens

>> www.deserthat.com <http://www.deserthat.com>

>>

>> The sleep of Reason produces monsters.

>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> game_preservation mailing list

>> game_preservation at igda.org

>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_preservation

>>

>

> --

> Henry Lowood

> Curator for History of Science & Technology Collections;

>      Film & Media Collections

> HRG, Green Library

> 557 Escondido Mall, Stanford University Libraries

> Stanford CA 94305-6004 USA

> http://www.stanford.edu/~lowood

> lowood at stanford.edu; 650-723-4602

>

>


-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Billy Cain
Geek / Catalyst

Sign up to test our games! http://www.sneakygames.com/vanguard.html

http://twitter.com/videogameparent
http://www.facebook.com/billyjoecain
IGDA - Austin: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=55276414674