[game_preservation] Preservation SIG's charter/description change?

[Jim Leonard]

On 3/6/2013 10:34 AM, Frank Cifaldi wrote:

> I always just kind of assumed the "History" part was silent and we were

> the "Game History Preservation SIG"


I concur, and would extend this idea as far as "the game (including its 
delivery medium) is only part of the history."

I see no reason to change the SIG's charter or description, unless there 
is massive dissent.
-- 
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org)
Check out some trippy MindCandy: http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.oldskool.org/
You're all insane and trying to steal my magic bag!