[LEAPSECS] LEAPSECS Digest, Vol 45, Issue 1

Daniel R. Tobias dan at tobias.name
Thu Sep 2 23:54:38 EDT 2010


On 2 Sep 2010 at 12:49, M. Warner Losh wrote:


> I'd wager that UTC, whatever its realization, would likely trump any

> locally written laws. After all, UTC has been a widely accepted

> approximation of the local laws that's attained the force of law

> through repetitive use


They can get away with that now, as the difference between the two is
too small to matter except to some highly specialized professions
whose issues haven't happened to come before the courts. If the
difference is allowed to drift unlimitedly, the conflict would become
obvious, and if your side wins, it will be a case of "bait and
switch", as you've gotten the public to think your scale is "close
enough for government work" to solar time, then you yank the rug from
under it.

One can never predict, however, which way courts will end up going on
that; the Supreme Court in the US in the 1940s found a farmer growing
crops to feed to his own animals to be "affecting interstate
commerce" and hence subject to Federal regulation even though none of
it ever left the state, and a few years ago they reiterated this
decision with regard to Federal bans on medical marijuana grown,
sold, and used within a state that allows it by state law. Now
they're wrestling with whether or not the Constitution protects the
right to gay marriage even though marriage of any sort is never
mentioned in the document. (I support it myself, but I'm not sure
how good an idea it is to be "finding" rights out of nowhere in 200-
year-old documents.) So it's always a crapshoot.

--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/




More information about the LEAPSECS mailing list