[LEAPSECS] why not ITU-T?
sla at ucolick.org
Mon Sep 6 12:49:11 EDT 2010
I wonder if there is not some perceived urgency for the ITU-R to act
on UTC because of the changes in technology. ITU-R covers broadcasts,
but most of the discussion in this mail refers to the internet.
That is covered by the ITU-T, not the ITU-R.
In response to the rapid evolution in computing the ITU-T had to
restructure its process in two ways. First, to streamline things so
that new recommendations could come out in a matter of weeks. Second
(and perhaps more relevant for UTC) to openly publish all of its
recommendations for free.
Lots of good links into ITU-T documents are referenced here
Is it already the case that the de facto authority over the time scale
of the world should reside with the ITU-T rather than with the ITU-R?
Steve Allen <sla at ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855
University of California Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m
More information about the LEAPSECS