[LEAPSECS] why not ITU-T?
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Mon Sep 6 13:11:11 EDT 2010
In message <20100906164911.GA27806 at ucolick.org>, Steve Allen writes:
>Is it already the case that the de facto authority over the time scale
>of the world should reside with the ITU-T rather than with the ITU-R?
So, Astronomers should Own Time, because they did it first, but
ITU-T should take time over from ITU-R because they are more recent ?
Given that ITU-T is irrellevant and has been int since they did the
OSI-protocols, I see no point...
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the LEAPSECS