[LEAPSECS] why not ITU-T?

Poul-Henning Kamp phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Mon Sep 6 13:11:11 EDT 2010

In message <20100906164911.GA27806 at ucolick.org>, Steve Allen writes:

>Is it already the case that the de facto authority over the time scale

>of the world should reside with the ITU-T rather than with the ITU-R?

So, Astronomers should Own Time, because they did it first, but
ITU-T should take time over from ITU-R because they are more recent ?

Given that ITU-T is irrellevant and has been int since they did the
OSI-protocols, I see no point...

Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

More information about the LEAPSECS mailing list