[LEAPSECS] [time-nuts] Leap second to be introduced at midnight UTC December 31 this year
hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Thu Jul 21 18:49:51 EDT 2016
sla at ucolick.org said:
> This idea pushes extra complexity into every implementation of low level
> kernel-space software, firmware, and hardware. That's nice as a policy for
> full employment of programmers, but it's hard to justify by any other
> metric. Instead those low level places should be as simple as possible, and
> that means making the underlying precision time scale, and thus any
> broadcast distributions of a precision time scale, as simple as possible.
Has anybody done any serious thinking about fixing the POSIX problem?
I assume the first step would be to have the kernel keep time in a non
leaping time scale. Is UT1 the obvious choice?
Would we need a version of ntp that used that time scale? (or some
non-leaping time scale)
I assume the file dates could be fixed with a flag day and one pass over the
whole file system.
I think the hard part would be time-stamps in network protocols or data
bases. Consider tar files or rsync.
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
More information about the LEAPSECS