[LEAPSECS] Leap second smearing test results

[Hal Murray]

>> I don't think the client pays any attention to that field in the packet.
> Hm, when Harlan made the proposal then he said the client did.

You are right.  There is some code in there.  Thanks.

It might be interesting to see what the RFC or book says about that area.  
I'd like to understand what  it does in the non-leap case and/or why.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.