[LEAPSECS] Leap second smearing test results

[Martin Burnicki]

Hal Murray wrote:
> 
>>> I don't think the client pays any attention to that field in the packet.
>> Hm, when Harlan made the proposal then he said the client did.
> 
> You are right.  There is some code in there.  Thanks.
> 
> It might be interesting to see what the RFC or book says about that area.  
> I'd like to understand what  it does in the non-leap case and/or why.

Dito. Unfortunately I haven't had the time to dig into it, yet.

I also wasn't even aware that the server can suggest a poll interval to
the client before Harlan mentioned this in his proposal.

Martin