markdown conversion routines

[Alan Hogan]

Is there a place that lists differences between different flavors?

Alan

http://blogic.com
contact at alanhogan.com


On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Bowerbird at aol.com wrote:


> i am considering writing converters

>  between my "zen markup language'

>  and "markdown", but i don't know

>  which version of markdown to target.

> 

>  i'd think it'd be the "pandoc" version,

>  and i understand that to be closest to

>  "multimarkdown", but gruber has said

>  he "disagrees" with "almost every part"

>  of multimarkdown's syntax additions...

> 

>  specifically, on 2008/03/14, gruber said:

> >  I despise what you've done with Text::Markdown, 

> >  which is to more or less make it an alias for 

> >  MultiMarkdown, almost every part of which

> >  I  disagree with in terms of syntax additions.

> 

>  of course, on 2008/02/18, gruber also said:

> >  I could give a rip about formal specifications,

> >  truth be told.

> 

>  so i guess what he thinks doesn't matter,

>  not if we wanna get all "formal" and such.

> 

>  then again, on 2009/02/27, gruber said:

> >  I never say never. Well, usually.

> 

>  and then he disappeared -- poof! -- from

>  this listserve; no posts in over 2 years...

> 

>  whatever.  if anyone has any input, spit it.

> 

>  -bowerbird

> _______________________________________________

> Markdown-Discuss mailing list

> Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net (mailto:Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net)

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20110622/d4d4d487/attachment.htm>