[om-list] scribble

[luke call]

On 04/23/16 19:15, OneModel general list [hendrik] wrote:
> Just for completeness, I should mention typed Racket -- it's a
> statically typed Scheme.

If it were a few years ago I might consider that.  Or if time to switch 
were no object and I thought it wouldn't put off most potential OM 
developers, and had oo support and for loops and many other cool things 
as good as scala, because scheme definitely is cool.  I enjoyed and was 
impressed with scheme, got excited about SISC once, but those who don't 
know it seem to much dislike lisp syntax.  Do you know if typed racket 
has the "full numeric tower", hygienic macros, and other common 
"completeness" scheme checkboxes?